1,问题描述
项目里使用了ADSUBCON,在调用BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE创建带subcontractor行项目的物料移动凭证时,发现主行项目中的批次赋值错误。
错误截图:
看到第一行,也就是物料移动类型是101的行项目上的批次是1208221560,实际调用bapi时的输入批次是另外一个1906050181,但是创建出来的物料凭证却不同,而且bapi返回消息中也没有提示任何信息。
<img class=”alignnone size-medium wp-image-6450″ src=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-05-26-740×255.jpg” width=”740″ height=”255″ srcset=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-05-26-740×255.jpg 740w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-05-26-768×264.jpg 768w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-05-26-1024×352.jpg 1024w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-05-26.jpg 1206w” sizes=”(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px” />
预想结果:
<img class=”alignnone size-medium wp-image-6452″ src=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-10-50-740×212.jpg” width=”740″ height=”212″ srcset=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-10-50-740×212.jpg 740w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-10-50-768×220.jpg 768w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-10-50-1024×293.jpg 1024w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-10-50.jpg 1206w” sizes=”(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px” />
2,问题分析
业务顾问一头雾水,所以只能搬出debug大法,此处略去10000000个字。。。。经过debug发现了一段标准SAP代码中的注释,
include:MM07MFS0_SEGMENTDATEN_EK_SETZE中
* EHP604 ADSUB GM080421 * in case of goods receipt for a recursive A&D subcon PO in MIGO * charge and valuation type of the main item can be changed * also if corresponding values are given in the PO * new values should not be overwritten with values from the PO
翻译过来就是,用tcode MIGO根据带subcon的采购订单创建物料凭证时,主行项目中的批次号和评估类型是不能被PO带过来的值覆盖,反言之,就是不使用MIGO创建物料凭证时PO中的批次和评估类型的优先级就高,会覆盖bapi输入参数里的值!!!
<img class=”alignnone size-medium wp-image-6453″ src=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-15-38-740×391.jpg” width=”740″ height=”391″ srcset=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-15-38-740×391.jpg 740w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-15-38-768×405.jpg 768w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-15-38-1024×540.jpg 1024w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-15-38.jpg 1205w” sizes=”(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px” />
这时再查看一下对应的PO批次,
MIGO中找到物料凭证中的PO
<img class=”alignnone size-medium wp-image-6456″ src=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-29-44-740×331.jpg” width=”740″ height=”331″ srcset=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-29-44-740×331.jpg 740w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-29-44-768×343.jpg 768w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-29-44.jpg 781w” sizes=”(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px” />
ME23n找到PO中的批次,果然和BAPI输入的不一致。
<img class=”alignnone size-medium wp-image-6455″ src=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-19-56-740×262.jpg” width=”740″ height=”262″ srcset=”http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-19-56-740×262.jpg 740w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-19-56-768×272.jpg 768w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-19-56-1024×363.jpg 1024w, http://www.baidusap.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-06-10_10-19-56.jpg 1117w” sizes=”(max-width: 740px) 100vw, 740px” />
以上。




